
SimLab™
Scenario Simulation & Output Grading
What SimLab™ Scenario Simulation & Output Grading Is
SimLab™ is a controlled “wind tunnel” for AI applications. Clients run realistic scenarios through an AI workflow, score the outputs against a rubric, and use those grades to optimize prompts, context, guardrails, and escalation rules before deployment (and continuously after).
What SimLab™ ​ Helps Leaders Do
It turns “we think it’s working” into measured reliability:
-
See how the system behaves under pressure (edge cases, ambiguity, conflicting constraints).
-
Quantify quality (accuracy, policy compliance, tone, completeness, latency, cost).
-
Identify failure modes (hallucination, overconfidence, missing citations, unsafe guidance).
-
Improve the application systematically (not by vibes).
-
​
SimLab™ in plain English
-
Pick scenarios (customer complaint, contract clause, HR policy question, incident report, board deck request).
-
Run the simulation through the AI workflow (agent + tools + context).
-
Grade the output using a scorecard (human, SME panel, or calibrated evaluator).
-
Compare versions (Prompt A vs Prompt B; Context Gate on/off; different retrieval sources).
-
Optimize based on what fails, not what impresses.
Core Components Of SimLab™
1) Scenario Library
-
Golden Path: common, expected requests.
-
Edge Cases: incomplete info, contradictory inputs, tricky user behavior.
-
Adversarial: prompt injection, policy evasion, data-exfil attempts (if relevant).
-
Operational Stress: peak volume, latency targets, cost constraints.
3) Variation Engine (A/B testing for AI behavior)
SimLab™ can compare:
-
Different prompts/system instructions
-
Different context packs (what’s included/excluded)
-
Different retrieval settings (top-k, recency, sources)
-
Different guardrails (refusal thresholds, escalation triggers)
-
Different agent routing (specialist vs generalist)
2) Grading & Rubrics (the heart of it)
A standardized scoring model that fits the use case. Typical dimensions:
-
Correctness (facts, reasoning, math)
-
Completeness (did it do all required steps)
-
Safety / Policy (did it violate guardrails)
-
Tone / Brand (aligned voice, clarity)
-
Evidence (citations, references, traceability)
-
Actionability (clear next steps, decisions supported)
-
Efficiency (token cost, time, tool calls)
Outputs become scores + failure tags (e.g., “Missing constraint”, “Overconfident”, “No escalation”)
4) Optimization Loop
Each cycle produces:
-
A prioritized list of fixes (“Change context order”, “Add policy excerpt”, “Tighten refusal”, “Add ask-back question”)
-
Updated “best known configuration.”
-
A regression suite so improvements don’t break other scenarios
Deliverables (What You Get)
-
SimLab™ Scenario Pack (20–60 scenarios tailored to their workflows)
-
SimLab™ Scorecard (rubrics + weights + pass/fail thresholds)
-
Model/Prompt Configuration Log (what changed, why, and impact)
-
Reliability Dashboard (baseline vs improved; by scenario type and failure mode)
-
Executive Decision Memo (what’s safe to launch, what isn’t, and risk posture)
​
​
Most AI failures aren’t “model problems.”
They’re design problems: unclear constraints, weak context, missing escalation rules, and no way to measure quality. SimLab™ makes AI adoption feel like engineering again:
test → grade → improve → verify → deploy.



